[Q] LG G Watch R dormant WiFi chip?

Search This thread

borfoo3

Member
Feb 23, 2011
5
3
Hey Guys,

Just noticed Android Wear's upcoming update claiming that it will enable the dormant WiFi that "most Android Wear watches already have the hardware for" and I'm hoping this one is no exception! Can anyone confirm if the G watch R's version of the Snapdragon 400 has the WiFi chip on board?

Really want to pull the trigger on this watch, wifi connectivity would push me over the fence to finally justify Android Wear :D...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darnell_Chat_TN

ouranos2k

New member
Mar 12, 2015
2
2
Peut être, en tout cas,la puce wifi est intégrée au snapdragon 400 normalement.
 
Last edited:

mdecker79

Senior Member
Mar 30, 2006
233
80
Old Bridge
The Snapdragon 400 which is in the LG G Watch R comes with the following on the chip found here:
https://www.qualcomm.com/products/snapdragon/processors/400

LTE:
Integrated 4G LTE Advanced World Mode, supporting LTE FDD, LTE TDD, WCDMA (DC-HSPA+), CDMA1x, EV-DO Rev. B, TD-SCDMA and GSM/EDGE
CAT4 speeds of up to 150 Mbps
3rd Generation integrated LTE modem, with support for LTE-Broadcast and LTE multimode dual-SIM (DSDS and DSDA)"

WiFi:
Qualcomm® VIVE™ 802.11n/ac† Integrated digital core

GPS:
Qualcomm® IZat™ Gen8A

Unless I'm missing something here those are all included in the chip right per QualComm's website.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darnell_Chat_TN

ChrisM75

Senior Member
Nov 2, 2013
580
268
They can still be disabled, and Qualcomm need payment for the drivers and license, also antennas are needed. Of course that all might be already covered.
 

borfoo3

Member
Feb 23, 2011
5
3
w w w .notebookcheck.net/Qualcomm-Snapdragon-400-APQ8026-SoC.127990.0.html

My fear was it had a variant of the Snapdragon 400, the APQ8026, that didn't have WiFi capability, or as mentioned earlier, a missing antenna (or some other hardware excuse or limitation) that would not permit enabling WiFi once the update is out... Hope I'm wrong
 
Last edited:

jwadle22

Member
Dec 4, 2007
6
2
I think its 8026 model you can refer it in wikipedia too

Darn.. Really hoping its the chipset with wireless built in... Really don't want to have to listen to all the Apple Watch owners at work.. "Well my watch does not need to be connected to the phone".. grr... BTW, I actually switched from an Iphone 6 back to android (been about 4 years) just for this watch.. Lets hope we do have the wireless chipset... Now Now I know some of you may be thinking.. "Why whats the big deal, its supposed to be a companion device".. I agree, just would be nice to have the option..:)
 

borfoo3

Member
Feb 23, 2011
5
3
Here's the chipset claims I found so far for this watch:

gsmarena.com/lg_g_watch_r-review-1173.php
Claims "Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 (MSM8226)", article is dated Dec 1 2014.

Source 2, Wikipedia, claims "Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8226"
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LG_G_Watch_R

Source 3, claims "MSM8026"
hwbot.org/hardware/device/3727/w110_g_watch_r/

So not sure if it varies by region, or nobody really knows which chipset lurks beneath.. No sign of specs on LG's website, the manual pdf, or Google Store.
 

Spere

Senior Member
Aug 7, 2013
479
170
What if you try to check chipset via adb, does "Hardware:" show anything on android wear?

Code:
adb shell cat proc/cpuinfo
 
Last edited:

Djblue82

Member
May 18, 2014
22
4
Other than updating the time and weather etc, what benefits would WiFi have anyways? The phone is still needed for most interactive services isn't it? And wouldn't any real benefits require the wear api to be updated heavily?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pfeffernuss

borfoo3

Member
Feb 23, 2011
5
3
Other than updating the time and weather etc, what benefits would WiFi have anyways? The phone is still needed for most interactive services isn't it? And wouldn't any real benefits require the wear api to be updated heavily?

By connecting through the same WiFi network, one would get the benefit of knowing all the notifications, calls, updates, etc. without having to have the main phone on you all the time (in my case, my beloved bulky note 3). Basically keeps the watch functional within the bigger range of a home/office WiFi network rather than just when it's in device Bluetooth range. At least that's what I'm hoping for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JMS74

Darnell_Chat_TN

Senior Member
Nov 29, 2008
2,444
503
Chattanooga, TN
Google Pixel 4 XL
Using WiFi, the watch would never need to be near the phone for anything, except security if you have a screen lock that turns on when away from the watch.

Everything could be managed via Wifi instead of Bluetooth. No more worries if walking away from your phone and losing connection to everything. Android Wear could be adjusted to manage everything via WiFi instead. Or, use both Bluetooth and Wifi interchangeably as needed.

Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: nowy57 and JMS74

ChrisM75

Senior Member
Nov 2, 2013
580
268
For me it would have extremely limited usefulness anyway, about the only place I have a Wifi connection is at home... where my phone will be.

AIDA 64 run on the watch reports the CPU as the 8026.
 

borfoo3

Member
Feb 23, 2011
5
3
Just a final update on the topic, it seems that another discussion regarding the older LG g watch (with similar internal hardware as newer g watch r), the only radio chipset seen was the BT 4.0, and "no wifi hardware in sight" as explained by fellow member ShadowEO:

http://xdaforums.com/g-watch/help/snapdragon-400-lg-g-watch-gps-t3032275/post59466827#post59466827

And a comparison of both watches confirming that the r version (w110) is identical in processor specs as the previous w100 model, both with the 8026 snapdragon 400, and no WiFi support:

http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=pdacomparer&id1=6694&id2=6405
 
  • Like
Reactions: ShadowEO

szaman89

Senior Member
Sep 26, 2010
162
43
"GPS Module Type: gpsOneGen 8A with GLONASS"
Does this mean our watch have gps like SWR3 but disabled?
 

hutchinsane_

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2013
115
31
Just a final update on the topic, it seems that another discussion regarding the older LG g watch (with similar internal hardware as newer g watch r), the only radio chipset seen was the BT 4.0, and "no wifi hardware in sight" as explained by fellow member ShadowEO:

http://xdaforums.com/g-watch/help/snapdragon-400-lg-g-watch-gps-t3032275/post59466827#post59466827

And a comparison of both watches confirming that the r version (w110) is identical in processor specs as the previous w100 model, both with the 8026 snapdragon 400, and no WiFi support:

http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=pdacomparer&id1=6694&id2=6405

using adb shell and cat /proc/cpuinfo the CPU reports as Qualcomm MSM 8226 LENOK (Flattened Device Tree)
and the MSM8226 does support WIFI. :)
 

Top Liked Posts