[Q] JIT on x10 mini

link87 · Nov 4, 2010

Is it posible to install JIT on x10 mini?

I've seen that it can be installed in the big X10:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=9000241#post9000241

Is it posible to install it on x10 mini following the same steps? have someone tried it?

Thanks

owain94 · Nov 5, 2010

i have installed it and i seems like its working on my mini pro

can some one post his "benchmarkPi" and/or "quadrant" score so we can compare

u20i with JIT and this is with underclocking to 480MHz standart is 600
Quadrant: 602
benchmarkPi: 7906 miliseconds

link87 · Nov 5, 2010

@owain94

Can you post your benchmark results without underclocking (at 600MHz)?
Do you have any stability problem with JIT? and what about battery?

I have these results without JIT:
Quadrant: 514

I'll put here my results when I install JIT

mariosraptor · Nov 5, 2010

how can i use jit on my xperia mini(just mini)? thanks.

owain94 · Nov 5, 2010

link87 said:
@owain94

Can you post your benchmark results without underclocking (at 600MHz)?
Do you have any stability problem with JIT? and what about battery?

I have these results without JIT:
Quadrant: 514

I'll put here my results when I install JIT

@600MHz almost 620

follow the link in the first post to install JIT

pabling19 · Nov 5, 2010

owain94 said:
@600MHz almost 620

follow the link in the first post to install JIT

Can you please tell us how you got 620? What performance techs did you do?

ME:
JiT enabled, unmodified LauncherPro homescreen, my setCPU was set at 600MHz (min and max, performance).. Bloatware removed, autokiller set to optimum, killed apps using adv. task killer pro before running benchmark, Still, the best I got was a pathetic 585 on Quadrant and 4.477Mflops.s on Linpack

...

Can you please share for other performance junkies? Thanks!

tsip4 · Nov 6, 2010

So did you notice any perfomance boost with JIT compiler?

waby38 · Nov 6, 2010

Work for me - X10 mini - 2.1

I've just installed, rebooted (wait, wait, wait...),
few lag on first restart, then all is ok!

Quadrant: 507-520 (before / NoJIT)
575 (after / with JIT)

I do not customize CPU freq, etc...

DaRk_dOg · Nov 6, 2010

I think it is working.

But i can't really tell untill someone with a stock X10 mini could post his results on Quadrant.

benjymous · Nov 6, 2010

DaRk_dOg said:
But i can't really tell untill someone with a stock X10 mini could post his results on Quadrant.

Using Quadrant Standard, my X10 mini gets a score of 508 (just below the Desire on the graph) so it looks like you're getting about a 15% boost

mariosraptor · Nov 6, 2010

Guys I cant make it work. I do everything riggt but I ge adb not found when I ask to pull build prop. Any help?

Sent from my E10i using XDA App

abhi98228 · Nov 7, 2010

owain94 said:
i have installed it and i seems like its working on my mini pro

can some one post his "benchmarkPi" and/or "quadrant" score so we can compare

u20i with JIT and this is with underclocking to 480MHz standart is 600
Quadrant: 602
benchmarkPi: 7906 miliseconds

my mini was rebboting at every step after cd sdcard/jit
whats the error?

DaRk_dOg · Nov 7, 2010

mariosraptor said:
Guys I cant make it work. I do everything riggt but I ge adb not found when I ask to pull build prop. Any help?

Sent from my E10i using XDA App

mariosraptor use this method here

but if you have mini or mini pro you should change this:

mount -o rw,remount -t yaffs2 /dev/block/mtdblock2 /system

with this one:

mount -o rw,remount -t yaffs2 /dev/block/mtdblock0 /system

abhi98228 · Nov 7, 2010

waby38 said:
I've just installed, rebooted (wait, wait, wait...),
few lag on first restart, then all is ok!

Quadrant: 507-520 (before / NoJIT)
575 (after / with JIT)

I do not customize CPU freq, etc...

how did u do it for mini? can u post a small clear tutorial?

DanielMalmgren · Nov 7, 2010

JiT on Mini is really good news! No need for waiting for 2.2 any more, right

I just have two questions before I go ahead myself:

1. Do you notice the difference in speed? I mean, Quadrant numbers are good but noticeable performance is better...

2. Any regressions? Anything not working? The guy in the original thread says it doesn't work good with HTC sense, I'm just thinking there could me more stuff not really compatible...

/Daniel

DaRk_dOg · Nov 7, 2010

DanielMalmgren said:
JiT on Mini is really good news! No need for waiting for 2.2 any more, right

I just have two questions before I go ahead myself:

1. Do you notice the difference in speed? I mean, Quadrant numbers are good but noticeable performance is better...

2. Any regressions? Anything not working? The guy in the original thread says it doesn't work good with HTC sense, I'm just thinking there could me more stuff not really compatible...

/Daniel

I don't think that a kernel compiled with build-in JIT is to compare with this method

However:

1. In general, no. Mini is already fast enough on android 2.1 so the only noticable difference is on a game or a demanding app.

2.No regressions, but i noticed that when i tried to access my picture album, for the first time it had to take so much time to generate thumbnails.

nobodyAtall · Nov 7, 2010

I couldn't notice any performance difference apart from a slight improvement in benchmarks. No crashes so far. It also takes a while for the first start in order for dalvik to populate its cache.

From what I've read, JIT is supposed to be very good for devices with high ram - I guess highier than ours

abhi98228 · Nov 8, 2010

Guys pls post a clear tutorial for jit installation i had problem of rebooting at many steps. And after installation my market is having some problems. Softwares get downloaded but dont get installed.nothing happens after download.

Sent from my E10i using XDA App

DanielMalmgren · Nov 8, 2010

Hmmm... Somehow I get the feeling that this isn't really worth the hassle...

/Dnaiel

oversim · Nov 8, 2010

DaRk_dOg said:
mariosraptor use this method here

but if you have mini or mini pro you should change this:

with this one:

...then is it safe on U20i?

[Q] JIT on x10 mini

Member

Inactive Recognized Developer

Member

Senior Member

Inactive Recognized Developer

Senior Member

Member

Member

Senior Member

Inactive Recognized Developer

Senior Member

Senior Member

Senior Member

Senior Member

Senior Member

Senior Member

Recognized Developer

Senior Member

Senior Member

Senior Member

Similar threads